Cindy Andrade / commentary
November 1, 2013

Cindy Andrade

Cindy Andrade

Information technology might be hard to imagine what it's like for Oakland students if you've never been through our schools. I accept friends who have dropped out, or are thinking about dropping out, because Oakland Unified, the commune I nourish, doesn't accept enough money to provide sufficient resource in lodge for us to be successful.

For years, students like me in Oakland have been request: How can we succeed when our classrooms are overcrowded and we take outdated computers, damaged textbooks, so few desks that students have to stand up or sit down on the flooring? How can we succeed without plenty AP classes, counselors and college prep support? In other words, how can yous expect united states to succeed when we're being fix to fail?

The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) is supposed to make sure more coin goes to the schools and students who need it nigh – low-income students, English learners, and foster youth. Oakland Unified has a large number of these students and will benefit profoundly from it.

Simply as the new funding system takes result in Oakland and beyond California, there's an important piece to call back. It's chosen the Local Control Funding Formula. That ways information technology must include local communities. Without existent student and community input into how funding is distributed and spent, we volition not be able to hold our districts and schools accountable to us. Schoolhouse districts across California must call up that they are working for us, the students , and that equity must be defined by what we need. After all, their local spending decisions affect our futures.

It'southward really upsetting to learn virtually the language for regulations that the State Board of Teaching will hear on Nov. 7. It opens the door for school districts to have full flexibility when we know that the constabulary is written to residual flexibility with the equity that districts are supposed to see in the law and evidence through the Local Control and Accountability Plans.

The proposed regulations give districts three spending options to choose from to justify the additional money they will go for English language learners, low-income students and foster youth. They can spend more on these students; they can provide more programs and services for them, or they can show that these students take accomplished more than by meeting additional learning goals. But these iii choices – Spend More, Provide More or Attain More – do not make it enough to require districts to spend the money on the students for whom it'south intended or show that they are spending the amount shut to what these students earned for the district in the base of operations, supplemental and concentration grants. The Achieve More pick shouldn't fifty-fifty exist an choice for how to spend the money. Reach More than is already one of the eight land priorities that districts are supposed to meet with money and justify in their local accountability plans.

My peers and I want regulations that crave school districts to spend more on the highest-need students; provide more services than they are already providing for these students and bear witness how this investment is working through increases in achievement and in all the other country priorities, including parent and educatee engagement and improving school climate. This should be the only choice! We deserve to succeed and to have the coin we help generate for the school district spent on creating more opportunities and providing more services for us!

I'm proud of California for recognizing that all students deserve the aforementioned opportunity to succeed and to contribute to California's future by passing the Local Control Funding Formula. Now the State Board of Education and school districts demand to make sure that students, parents and communities are authentically part of this process, and honor the equity intended by LCFF, and then that the formula can brand the impacts we all know it can.

…

Cindy Andrade is a 11th grader at Oakland Loftier Schoolhouse and a fellow member of Californians for Justice and the Campaign for Quality Pedagogy (CQE). This op-ed is adapted from a spoken communication she gave on the steps of the Capitol on May 21st at the CQE'due south Day of Action in Sacramento.

Sign up here for a no-cost online subscription to EdSource Today for reports from the largest teaching reporting team in California.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-cost daily email on latest developments in education.